Lefty professors at American colleges and universities are shocked, (shocked!) to discover that under the new rules promulgated by the Trump administration they are obliged, for the first time in their careers, to watch their Ps and Qs or else face serious and negative consequences.
Academics from Florida are leading the parade with their complaints since it is Governor Ron DeSantis, the point man for President Trump in this educational counter-revolution, who first instituted reforms aligned with the new policy.
The bitter grievance of these campus whiners is that they are now being heavily penalized for using the wrong words. Their favorite courses are being canceled. Entire departments are being scrutinized to see if there is even a vestige of intellectual diversity, and when those looking fail to find any, there are consequences. They are under the gun.
This is nothing less than poetic justice. These professors are finding that they do not much like it now that the shoe is on the other foot. They do not have a smidgen of appreciation for the age-old rule that turnabout is fair play. Now that they are subjected to the same sort of stultifying oversight they have long imposed upon the rare conservative or libertarian professor allowed on campus, the outcry is deafening.
Professors like me have little sympathy. We have been subjected to sensitivity training—re-education camps, in effect—for supposedly misusing pronouns, and for using words like “Oriental,” “cotton,” “slavery,” and “freedom.” There was even a professor excoriated for correctly pronouncing a Chinese phrase in class that sounded like the N word (nèi ge, literally meaning “that one,” and used as a filler word like the English “uh” or “um.”). As for “niggardly,” let us not go there.
Nevertheless, I think that Trump, DeSantis, and many other Republican politicians, bless them, are barking up the wrong tree. Their hearts are indeed in the right place, the exact right place, but their policies leave something to be desired.
Why do I say this?
If every last black “studies” department, feminist “studies” department, queer “studies” department, every last one of them were canceled, the virus would still remain in the academic patient’s body. The tenured Marxist professors who taught them would merely move over to humanities and social science departments. The administrators who run these dens of iniquity would still be in charge of the campus zoo.
Even if they were prevented from using words and phrases like “intersectionality,” “white fragility,” “labor theory of value,” and precluded from attacking anything that is actually “color-blind,” they would still exude wokeism, DEI (“Didn’t Earn It”) and all the rest. They can eschew the words, courses, and programs, and still do quite well for themselves cramming their garbage down the throats of hapless students in departments of history, political science, sociology, and economics. We can compel music departments to once again study and play dead white males like Bach and Mozart. We can mandate that literature departments once again put the dead white male, Shakespeare, back on the reading list. But it will still be the same sort of commies perverting the youth of the nation.
Nor should we be content by merely ensuring that outside speakers are not brutalized by campus hooligans, including, disgracefully, professors.
What, then, can be done, if we want ideological and intellectual diversity on campus? If we do not care whether the campus “looks like America”; if we want to ensure that at least some academics charged with educating the youth think like at least half of America?
Simple. Create affirmative action (I apologize for using curse words in a family periodical) for conservative and libertarian professors. Hire them, and only them for tenure track jobs. Do not offer tenure to any but them, until full parity is reached. Ditto for administrators. No more pinko provosts, etc. Then, for the first time in a long time, there will be true intellectual diversity on campus.
How did we get into this pickle in the first place? Why are our campuses presently overrun with parlor pinks, commies, Marxists, and all the rest?
Milton Friedman offered a plausible explanation: the Vietnam War and draft dodging for staying in school. Young men of a conservative bent went over there, 10,000 miles way, to fight and die in this war. Young lefties, instead, pursued graduate degrees in droves. Then, they became assistant professors, associate professors, full professors, deans, provosts and university presidents. They now infest our campuses and have trained the generation that will replace them.
But the way ahead is clear. Stop bugging campus “progressives.” Instead, replace them.
Originally published here.
Walter’s Substack is free today. But if you enjoyed this post, you can tell Walter’s Substack that his writing is valuable by pledging a future subscription. You won't be charged unless they enable payments.
Dear Bubba: Thanks for complimenting me as your mentor. I appreciate that. I appreciate that we can disagree, sharply, about important issues, and still remain friends, good friends. Before my excommunication from the Mises, Ron Paul and Libertarian Institute's for disagreement about Israel, I would never had said anything like that. I would have thought it silly to state the obvious. Now, unhappily, I feel like saying how important this is. I will no longer take this for granted.
As for mentors and mentees disagreeing, no big deal. Murray was my mentor, I often disagreed with him, and I am now treating you in the same friendly manner with which he treated me.
Let me now respond to your points. Please read, or re-read, this essay of Murray's. That's my response to your suggestion that I stick to narrow anarcho-capitalism:
Rothbard, Murray N. 1967. “War guilt in the Middle East. Left and Right. Spring-Autumn; http://mises.org/journals/lar/pdfs/3_3/3_3_4.pdf; http://original.antiwar.com/rothbard/2010/03/02/war-guilt-in-the-middle-east/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+antiwar-original+%28Antiwar.com+Original+Articles%29&utm_content=Google+Reader
As to my supposedly too aggressive comments to non libertarians, which fails to convert people to libertarianism, two comments. First, I'm not all that interest in converting people to liberty. That's great, and I do relish that, but my primary goal is to just tell the truth, whatever happens. I'm a truth addict. Second, as for my secondary goal of converting the heathen (there I go again, the commies won't like that) I have learned that there is no best way to do this. Who were the two people more successful than anyone else in so doing? Ayn Rand for my generation, and Ron Paul for yours. Yet, they were polar opposites! Ayn Rand was really nasty (I take after her quite a bit). Ron Paul's middle name should be "sweetness." He never compromises with his vision, but he is gentle and kind in his verbiage
Dear Bubba:
If I followed the pattern of Ayn Rand, or representatives of the Mises or Ron Paul Institutes, I’d kick you off my Substack, and refuse to respond to your criticism. Rather, I follow the pattern of Murray Rothbard, who never excommunicated any fellow libertarian for anything.
I am still an anarcho-capitalist libertarian (an cap). And, you make a good point, no, an excellent one, that this essay of mine is incompatible with ancap. So, how do I justify this? Consider the following.
As a full, pure ancap, how do I address the issue of Donald v Harvard. I say the former is governmental, and the latter is quasi governmental (at least it represents the Democratic Party and lives off of tax funds), so a pox on both.
How do I answer the question of should students be forced to wear uniforms or say the pledge of allegiance? Let the market decide, and get govt out of the picture.
What about the Russia-Ukraine War? Again, both are evil govts. Instead, I wrote this:
Block, Walter E. 2022A. “Russia and Ukraine.” March 5;
http://ronpaulinstitute.org/archives/featured-articles/2022/march/05/russia-and-ukraine/;
http://www.ronpaulinstitute.org/archives/featured-articles/2022/march/05/russia-and-ukraine/
Block, Walter E. 2022B. “Nuclear War.” April 27;
http://ronpaulinstitute.org/archives/featured-articles/2022/april/27/nuclear-war/
Nuclear War? http://www.ronpaulinstitute.org/archives/featured-articles/2022/april/27/nuclear-war/
Block, Walter E. 2022C. “How will human life on earth end, and what to do about this?” May 19; http://ronpaulinstitute.org/archives/featured-articles/2022/may/19/how-will-human-life-on-earth-end-and-what-to-do-about-this/
What about the war between Israel and its enemies such as Iran, Hamas, etc. Again, both are qausi or actual governments. So both are evil.
Instead, I wrote this:
Block, Walter E. and Alan Futerman. 2021. The Classical Liberal Case for Israel. With commentary by Benjamin Netanyahu. Springer Publishing Company; https://rd.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-981-16-3953-1; https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-981-16-3953-1;
file:///C:/Users/wblock/AppData/Local/Microsoft/Windows/INetCache/Content.Outlook/I1L1K1JR/Block-Futerman2021_Book_TheClassicalLiberalCaseForIsra.pdf
summary of this book: https://cosmosandtaxis.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Block_Futerman_summary_CT_Vol12_Iss_9_10.pdf
You can see where I’m going with this. From a pure ancap perspective, I can say very little about current events, other than all govts are evil. But there is more to libertarianism than ancap. There is also minarchism, classical liberalism. If you want to make comments about the real world, you can only do so from one of these other perspectives.
Yes, Russia and Ukraine are both govts. But which is MORE evil. Yes, Israel and Iran are both govts. But which is MORE evil. You can’t do this from a pure ancap point of view. Yet, I want to do so, and in doing so, I don’t think I’m violating an capism.
I am guided in this decision as I am in somany other things by my mentor and friend, Murray Rothbard. Please read this, where he comments on this very question:
Rothbard, Murray N. 1967. “War guilt in the Middle East. Left and Right. Spring-Autumn; http://mises.org/journals/lar/pdfs/3_3/3_3_4.pdf; http://original.antiwar.com/rothbard/2010/03/02/war-guilt-in-the-middle-east/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+antiwar-original+%28Antiwar.com+Original+Articles%29&utm_content=Google+Reader
Please feel free to respond.